Welcome
- Details
- Published on Thursday, 01 November 2012 10:58
- Written by Super User
I know what you are thinking: "Here we go... Another site about Angelina Jolie....". But usually, the most sites you can find about her are about others as well...Here, no other. No one else than the wonderful Angelina Jolie.
I am regularly doing my best to give you the most about Angie. Detailed filmography with video clips and HQ captures, over 74.000 HQ pictures, 17.000 scans of magazines, loads of audio and videoclips, articles, the best links, and goodies such as wallpapers, icons, puzzles, screensavers, skins....
I, the webmaster, and my team, are 100% devoted to Angelina Jolie, as to you. Looking for anything about Angelina? You know what site you have to visit ;)
For a full-access to the Absolument Jolie webste and the news, please connect or register !
Last update : 29/07/2026 
Angelina Jolie cuts a glum figure amid bitter Brad Pitt legal battle after ex asked court to order her to turn over financial records
- Details
- Published on Saturday, 08 August 2026 08:20
- Written by Daily mail
Angelina Jolie cut a glum figure in Beverly Hills this week amid an ongoing and bitter legal battle with ex-husband Brad Pitt over their French winery Chateau Miraval.The 51-year-old actress, whose older brother James Haven recently came out as gay, was seen stepping out for a lowkey errand run on Friday. Jolie and Pitt have been embroiled in a court battle over the French winery, with a trial set to take place next year in February 2027.The star kept it casual during her latest outing wearing a pair of black trousers as well as a black sweater. She additionally slipped into a pair of black flats and carried a black leather purse over the crook of her arm. The actress's long locks flowed down in light waves past her shoulders and she also opted for a pair of stylish shades. Jolie was spotted climbing out of a sleek vehicle inside what appeared to be a parking garage before heading to her next destination. Daily Mail has reached out to representatives for Jolie for comment, but has yet to hear back. Jolie and Pitt's legal showdown took a dramatic turn this week when the F1 actor asked the court to order the Maleficent star to turn over financial records. He asked the court to order the actress to produce records showing her income from 2017 to 2019, after she claimed to have 'largely put her career on hold' and forewent 'years of compensation' following their 2016 separation. Jolie allegedly agreed to produce financial records from the years 2017 to 2021, but has apparently only produced documents for the years 2020 and 2021.In court documents obtained by The Daily Mail, Pitt's lawyers allege Jolie has been withholding specific financial documents despite agreeing to produce said records. Jolie's Cross-Complaint alleges that, after the parties' 2016 separation, she put her career on hold, "forgoing years of compensation"; that Pitt possessed "substantial leverage and control" over her due in part to her financial condition at that time.'And that by 2019 she concluded she needed to sell her interest in Miraval to obtain "financial independence" from him,' Pitt's filing reads. 'On February 23, 2026, Jolie withdrew both her agreement to provide declarations responsive to Request Nos. 81 and 82 for the full 2017-2021 period and her agreement to produce participation statements from that same period.'They allege she instead provided 'supplemental responses limiting her production to 2020 and 2021, and later produced profit participation statements and tax returns for those two years only as well.'They are now seeking to produce documents showing her annual income and profit participation statements from 2017 to 2019.'Prior to the IDC [Informal Discovery Conference], Plaintiffs proposed that Jolie stipulate that she was not under economic pressure before January 1, 2020, and that Pitt did not exert economic coercion on her from 2017 to 2019. Jolie declined.'At the IDC, the Court then separately proposed limiting the scope of Jolie’s testimony concerning her earnings and compensation. 'Again, Jolie declined the proposal. Instead, Jolie confirmed at the IDC that she may argue at trial that Pitt used Miraval as leverage to control her and that her decision to put her career on hold bears on why the proposed NDA was allegedly abusive. The parties therefore did not resolve the dispute.'The Requests seek information directly bearing on financial assertions Jolie pleaded: that she forwent "years of compensation," that Miraval was her "most important asset." 'And that Pitt's control over Miraval distributions gave him "substantial leverage and control" over her during the period leading to her 2019 decision to sell her stake in Chateau Miraval.' One of the requests 'seeks documents sufficient to show Jolie's earned income during the period between her separation from Pitt through 2019 - the year Jolie allegedly decided she needed to sell Miraval.'
And the other request 'seeks documents sufficient to show Jolie's earnings from the profit-sharing bonuses she received during that period from her earlier acting and directing roles.'Yet, in a previous legal filing, Jolie hit back at Pitt's characterization of her remarks for 'financial independence', claiming she was misquoted.She also noted she has already provided financial records despite having 'no obligation to do so.''Pitt claims that Jolie has put her entire financial condition at issue going back to 2017 because of her allegation that she was seeking "financial independence." (IDC Statement at 3:2-6.),' a documented filed in June stated.'But Pitt's selective quote misleadingly fails to include the entirety of her allegation. Jolie does not allege that she was seeking financial independence in the abstract; she alleges that she was seeking “financial independence from her ex-husband [Pitt]."'The document also stated that the actress 'never alleged that she was in financial distress - her allegations are clear that she sought to untangle her financial life from the ex-spouse she was divorcing. That distinction is dispositive.'It further notes: 'Pitt also inaccurately ties his demand for a coercive NDA to Jolie's financial condition, but here too his summaries are not accurate.' It was later added that, 'The issue is not whether Jolie needed the money - the issue is that she was trying to untangle her life and her finances from her controlling and abusive ex husband. That distinction makes all the difference.' They also allege digging into Jolie's finances from 2017-2019 pose a 'serious invasion' of her 'privacy rights.' The F1 actor first sued Jolie in February 2022, alleging she had secretly sold her half of their French winery, where the former couple married in 2014, without his consent.The star claimed that he and Jolie had an implied agreement that neither would sell their share to a third party without the other's approval, a deal Jolie's side has denied ever existed.Two years after their marriage, it came to an explosive end after the pair got into an alleged physical altercation while on a private flight with their six children and Jolie later filed for divorce.The pair welcomed three children together during their romance: Shiloh in 2006 and twins Vivienne and Knox in 2008.They also adopted two more, Zahara and Pax, and Pitt legally adopted the son that Angelina had adopted before they got together, Maddox.Since they split, the two stars have been embroiled in one of the most publicized legal battles in Hollywood history over custody of their children, as well as the winery that they once owned together.In May 2021, after years of duking it out in court, Pitt and Jolie were officially granted joint custody of their six children, but one month later, the judge's decision was thrown out.And in late 2024, it was revealed that the former couple had reached a divorce settlement following a lengthy, eight-year battle. The fallout from their split has gotten progressively uglier.Zahara, Vivienne, Maddox, Shiloh and Knox have all stopped using their father's last name. It's unclear where Pax stands.Pitt has since moved on romantically and has been dating jewelry designer Ines de Ramon for the last few years.
 |
source : Daily mail 
Angelina Jolie's brother James Haven comes out as gay at age 53... after split from wife Romi Imbelli: 'I am now free'
- Details
- Published on Friday, 07 August 2026 04:20
- Written by Daily mail
Angelina Jolie's older brother James Haven came out as gay on Thursday as he emotionally opened up about entering a 'new chapter' in his life. The 53-year-old actor, who is the son of Jon Voight and Marcheline Bertrand, took part in a candid discussion on his ex-wife and close friend Romi Imbelli's Substack livestream. Haven and Imbelli married in August 2024 during a ceremony in Laguna Beach, California. It was later revealed that she filed to annul the marriage just 15 days later. In the clip, Imbelli explained that she wanted to give Haven the 'opportunity to speak on this' after he also released a statement which was shared to her Substack.'Today's a new day,' she explained. 'We get to be this and you get to be, Gem, what are you?' He let out a laugh to ask, 'Is this the cue?' before he told viewers, 'I'm gay.'Haven also read the statement and explained, 'When I was a little boy, I was absolutely obsessed with the Disney princesses. 'I would sneak glitter onto my cheeks, swipe mascara onto my lashes, and for those moments, I felt like magic.' Jolie's brother added that he 'didn't have the language back then to explain why I just knew it made me feel more like me.' He further expressed, 'It was never about pretending to be someone else. It was about letting a part of myself shine that had always been there.' As years passed, Haven had started to question 'if that sparkle was something I had to hide to be accepted by the "normal" boys around me. 'Like so many gay kids, I learned to question parts of myself long before I learned to celebrate them.' Haven also shared that he was ready to tell the truth. 'Not because he's changed, but because he's tired of hiding. Coming out isn't about becoming someone new, it's about allowing everyone else to meet the person who has been here all along.' The actor added, 'I hope my family and others can choose love over fear, understanding over judgment, and connection over the beliefs that may have kept us apart. 'I hope they can look beyond the labels and simply see me with the same heart, the same laugh, the same soul they've always known.'
Haven explained that the 'little boy with glitter on his face and mascara on his lashes was never confused, broken, or something to be ashamed of. 'He was simply gay. He was joyful. He was brave before he even knew it.' Haven also talked about stepping into a 'new chapter' and feeling 'free' in his life through an additional Substack video. 'Today is August 6, 2026 and I, James Haven, begin a new chapter in my life. After many years of healing from childhood trauma, I am now free to live the life I believe I was always meant to live.'One of hope, one of peace, and one of love. So, as my story unfolds, I want you all to know that I do it with an open heart with nothing but love for myself and for all of you.' He sent gratitude to those who read his statement and for 'allowing me to be what I was meant to be.' Daily Mail has reached out to reps for Jolie for comment, but has yet to hear back. During the livestream, Imbelli told Haven that she had a feeling he had been gay when they married, but did not want to admit it to herself. 'I didn't want to see it. I didn't want to believe. I knew it and I wanted to support you and love you,' she said. 'And then I didn't want to believe it because then it would mean losing you in that capacity, which I couldn't.' Imbelli, who has known Haven for over 20 years, said that he was still her 'life partner' following the split. 'We will do life together. You are not my close friend. You are my love. And you happen to be gay,' she said.
Page Six also reported on Thursday that Haven will officially launch his own weekly podcast titled Save Haven with James Haven, although a release date has yet to be announced. Imbelli, who is preparing to release a memoir titled Breathe Mija, also shared a post to her Instagram account that included photos of both her and Haven. 'I wasn't here to out someone I love. I was here to help set someone free. There is a difference. In return he set me free,' she wrote.'Forgiveness, grace, and unconditional love have carried us to this moment. We ask only that you give him the same compassion as he learns to walk through this world with his head held high, exactly as God made him.'Love doesn't always fit into the boxes we're taught it should. Sometimes it transforms. Sometimes it changes shape. Sometimes it asks us to let go of what we imagined so we can embrace what is true.' She added, 'I'll always love him. Just not as his wife, but as my family, my best friend, and one of the greatest loves of my life...' Haven and Imbelli married in August 2024 after knowing each other for over 23 years at the time. The following year in March, Imbelli announced that she had filed for an annulment. Legal documents revealed that Romi filed for an annulment on August 27, 2024, just 15 days after the wedding took place. Haven and Jolie are both the children of Voight and Bertrand. The siblings infamously shared a controversial kiss at the 2000 Oscars and Golden Globes.
 |
source : Daily mail
Brad Pitt asks court to ORDER Angelina Jolie to turn over financial records after she claimed she put 'career on hold'
- Details
- Published on Wednesday, 05 August 2026 04:31
- Written by Daily mail
The legal showdown between Brad Pitt and his ex Angelina Jolie has taken another dramatic turn.Pitt, 62, is now asking the court to order Jolie to produce records showing her income from 2017 to 2019, after she claimed to have 'largely put her career on hold' and forewent 'years of compensation' following their 2016 separation.Jolie, 51, allegedly agreed to produce financial records from the years 2017 to 2021, but has apparently only produced documents for the years 2020 and 2021. The Daily Mail has contacted representatives for both Pitt and Jolie for comment. In court documents obtained by The Daily Mail, Pitt's lawyers allege Jolie has been withholding specific financial documents despite agreeing to produce said records.'Jolie’s Cross-Complaint alleges that, after the parties’ 2016 separation, she put her career on hold, “forgoing years of compensation”; that Pitt possessed “substantial leverage and control” over her due in part to her financial condition at that time; and that by 2019 she concluded she needed to sell her interest in Miraval to obtain “financial independence” from him,' Pitt's filing reads. 'On February 23, 2026, Jolie withdrew both her agreement to provide declarations responsive to Request Nos. 81 and 82 for the full 2017-2021 period and her agreement to produce participation statements from that same period.'They allege she instead provided 'supplemental responses limiting her production to 2020 and 2021, and later produced profit participation statements and tax returns for those two years only as well.'They are now seeking to produce documents showing her annual income and profit participation statements from 2017 to 2019. 'Prior to the IDC [Informal Discovery Conference], Plaintiffs proposed that Jolie stipulate that she was not under economic pressure before January 1, 2020, and that Pitt did not exert economic coercion on her from 2017 to 2019. Jolie declined.'At the IDC, the Court then separately proposed limiting the scope of Jolie’s testimony concerning her earnings and compensation. Again, Jolie declined the proposal. Instead, Jolie confirmed at the IDC that she may argue at trial that Pitt used Miraval as leverage to control her and that her decision to put her career on hold bears on why the proposed NDA was allegedly abusive. The parties therefore did not resolve the dispute.''The Requests seek information directly bearing on financial assertions Jolie pleaded: that she forwent “years of compensation,” that Miraval was her “most important asset,” and that Pitt’s control over Miraval distributions gave him “substantial leverage and control” over her during the period leading to her 2019 decision to sell her stake in Chateau Miraval.''Request No. 81 seeks documents sufficient to show Jolie’s earned income during the period between her separation from Pitt through 2019— the year Jolie allegedly decided she needed to sell Miraval—while Request No. 82 seeks documents sufficient to show Jolie’s earnings from the profit-sharing bonuses she received during that period from her earlier acting and directing roles.' 'Jolie may be able to establish from public information that she held fewer acting or directing roles from 2017–2019 than she did in prior years. But paragraph 23 of her Cross Complaint goes further: it alleges that she forwent “years of compensation.” Documents showing the earned income and profit participation payments she received during those years will permit Plaintiffs to test the accuracy and context of that allegation.' Yet, in a previous legal filing, Jolie hit back at Pitt's characterization of her remarks for 'financial independence', claiming she was misquoted.
She also noted she has already provided financial records despite having 'no obligation to do so.' 'Pitt claims that Jolie has put her entire financial condition at issue going back to 2017 because of her allegation that she was seeking “financial independence.” (IDC Statement at 3:2-6.),' a documented filed in June stated. 'But Pitt’s selective quote misleadingly fails to include the entirety of her allegation. Jolie does not allege that she was seeking financial independence in the abstract; she alleges that she was seeking “financial independence from her ex-husband [Pitt].”''Separating from one’s ex-husband is categorically different from an allegation that one is suffering general financial distress. Jolie has never alleged that she was in financial distress—her allegations are clear that she sought to untangle her financial life from the ex-spouse she was divorcing. That distinction is dispositive.'It further notes: 'Pitt also inaccurately ties his demand for a coercive NDA to Jolie’s financial condition, but here too his summaries are not accurate. Appearing to mock her, Pitt highlights that the NDA he proposed “nearly broke her,” and concludes from this, in conjunction with Jolie’s conclusion that she had to sell Miraval to someone else, that Jolie placed Her entire financial condition at issue because she felt “financially cornered.” But the phrase “financially cornered” is Pitt’s phrase, not Jolie’s. Jolie never once made that allegation. 'And the distinction above applies here too: her ex-husband was attempting to have her sign an NDA to cover up his abuse of her and their children as a condition to him buying her most valuable asset, which was their biggest financial entanglement. The issue is not whether Jolie needed the money—the issue is that she was trying to untangle her life and her finances from her controlling and abusive ex husband. That distinction makes all the difference.' They also allege digging into Jolie's finances from 2017-2019 pose a 'serious invasion' of her 'privacy rights.' 'In short, the entire basis for Pitt compelling these answers is a made-up theory that Jolie did not allege. Nevertheless, to narrow the dispute, and although she feels very strongly that she did not have to do this, Jolie already agreed to produce and has in fact produced her tax returns, and all of her profit participation statements showing any income received, for 2020 and 2021 Although Jolie had no obligation to do so, producing these documents should have ended this dispute. These two years of private financial information—leading up to (2020) and during (2021) – the very dispute that is at the center of this case—already provided Pitt all the insight he needs into Jolie’s financial condition. Going back any further is a serious invasion of Jolie’s privacy rights'.
For a decade, Pitt and Jolie were seen as Hollywood's 'It' couple during their long-term relationship after they met on the set of the 2005 film Mr and Mrs Smith.They married in August 2014 during a secret ceremony in the South of France and welcomed three children together during their romance: Shiloh in 2006 and twins Vivienne and Knox in 2008.They also adopted two more, Zahara and Pax, and Pitt legally adopted the son that Angelina had adopted before they got together, Maddox. But in 2016, it came to an explosive end after the pair got into an alleged physical altercation while on a private flight with their six children and Jolie later filed for divorce. Jolie later claimed that Pitt 'choked' one of the children during the horrifying dispute and 'struck' another in the face, leaving her and the youngsters feeling like 'hostages' and cowering in fear under a blanket for hours until they landed.She also alleged that he grabbed her by the head, slammed her against a wall, and violently shook her at one point during the flight - which resulted in her injuring her back and elbow. Pitt's representative called Jolie's account 'completely untrue' to CNN at first, but then released an amended statement to the publication that read, 'Angelina's story continues to evolve each time she tells it.'Brad has accepted responsibility for what he did but will not for things he didn’t do. He has been on the receiving end of every type of personal attack and misrepresentation.'Thankfully, the various public authorities she has tried to use against him over the past six years have made their own independent decisions. Brad will continue to respond in court as he has consistently done.'Since they split, the two stars have been embroiled in one of the most publicized legal battles in Hollywood history over custody of their children, as well as the winery that they once owned together.In May 2021, after years of duking it out in court, Pitt and Jolie were officially granted joint custody of their six children, but one month later, the judge's decision was thrown out.The fallout from their split has gotten progressively uglier. Zahara, Vivienne, Maddox, Shiloh and Vivienne have all stopped using their father's last name. It's unclear where Pax stands. Pitt has since moved on romantically and has been dating jewelry designer Ines de Ramon for the last few years.
 |
source : Daily mail
Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie's French winery threatened by raging wildfires amid legal battle over estate
- Details
- Published on Monday, 03 August 2026 06:21
- Written by Super User
Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie's French winery Chateau Miraval has been threatened by raging wildfires amid their ongoing legal war over the estate. The 62-year-old actor, whose youngest daughter Vivienne recently filed to drop his last name along with other siblings, initially purchased the winery back in 2012 with the Maleficent actress, 51. Earlier this week, it was revealed that George Clooney and wife Amal as well as nine-year-old twins, Alexander and Ella, were forced to evacuate their French home in the Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur region. Wildfires have been spreading across Europe in other countries including Italy and Spain. Chateau Miraval is located in the village of Correns in the southeastern area of France, where the Correns Fire is currently burning. In a photo obtained by TMZ, brown smoke could be seen filling the sky close to the winery and its sprawling vineyards. Firefighters have been using water from a private lake on the expansive property to help extinguish the flames, according to the outlet. Another image captured towers of gray smoke near a vineyard in Correns on Friday. After the sun had set, the glow of red and orange flames near Correns filled the night sky as firefighters continued to battle the inferno. Daily Mail has reached out to reps for Jolie for comment. A rep for Pitt denied to comment. The former couple are not the first Hollywood celebrities to be affected by the wildfires in Europe. Clooney revealed that his family were forced to flee their French residence due to the flames in a letter to the mayor of Brignoles, Didier Brémond, which his representative confirmed to People on Wednesday. In the short but stirring letter, the actor reportedly vowed to support the French town, which is home to just under 18,000 people, regardless of the impact of the encroaching fires. 'Dear Didier, At this point we have no idea whether our beautiful home makes it through this terrible moment,' Clooney began.'As we evacuate Brignoles we want to emphasise 2 things, first we hope you and the people of our city are safe and second that Amal and I are committed to making sure that whatever happens to our village, we are part of this community and we’ll be part of making it whole,' he wrote. 'We love Brignoles and our friends who live there.' The Clooneys announced their evacuation on the same day that the EU's emergency response chief warned that wildfires could potentially engulf 'all of Europe' within days. Greece, Italy and Central Europe are now expected to face the highest wildfire risk in the coming weeks, raising fears of fresh disasters even as firefighters continue battling major blazes across southern Europe.
Pitt and Jolie have been embroiled in an ongoing legal battle over their French winery, with a trial set to take place next year in February 2027. The F1 actor first sued Jolie in February 2022, alleging she had secretly sold her half of their beloved Provençal estate, where the former couple married in 2014, without his consent.The star claimed that he and Jolie had an implied agreement that neither would sell their share to a third party without the other's approval, a deal Jolie's side has denied ever existed.In legal documents obtained by the Daily Mail, Pitt requested Jolie turn in her tax records and other financial documents pertaining to the years 2017–2019, based on remarks she made that she says Pitt is taking out of context.The Maleficent actress said in legal documents reviewed by TMZ that his efforts are part of a 'continued mischaracterization and selective quoting' of statements she's made about the long-running case.Pitt told the court that he has expended time and labor into the winery in Correns, France, and he claimed Jolie breached their pact when she sold her share of the estate to Russian billionaire Yuri Shefler.Jolie told the court that she didn't need Pitt's approval over the transaction; and that he took past statements that she made about the sale to achieve 'financial independence' out of context.The Daily Mail also previously reached out to representatives for Jolie and Pitt for further comment on the story.Jolie clarified her comment to mean that she wanted to delineate her finances from Pitt's in an effort to separate herself from him, and not about her money situation in general. Pitt's attorneys told the court that the remark essentially opened her up to scrutiny considering the nature of the litigation. Jolie's legal team said the gist of her remark was that she had been looking for 'financial independence from her ex-husband.' It was added that 'separating from one's ex-husband is categorically different from allegations that one is suffering from general financial distress.' Her team emphasized that she had been looking to 'untangle her life and her finances from' Pitt.And in June, it was reported that Jolie is 'looking forward' to the upcoming trial.
It came after the Daily Mail revealed that Pitt scored a major legal win as he is set to go face-to-face with Shefler who bought Jolie's stake in the vineyard.A California Superior Court has also granted the F1 star's motion to depose members of the Stoli Group, which is run by Shefler, per a June 17 court filing obtained by People.One year earlier, Pitt sought to depose the company's executive Alexey Oliynik. But lawyers for Jolie argued Oliynik did not have to present documents or appear for a deposition due to being a Swiss resident.But now according to the filing, depositions for Oliynik as well as other 'persons most qualified' need to occur by September 30 of this year in London.One of Jolie's lawyers also told People that Pitt's latest legal wins 'have made no impact on the merits of the case, and certainly has no impact on Ms. Jolie's case.' The actress is instead 'looking forward to defeating the case at trial next year so that their family can finally focus their energies on healing and moving on.' A separate source claimed to People that Pitt 'refused to work' with the Stoli Group due to Jolie being the one who had chosen the company.But an insider close to the Hollywood actor stated that his legal victories in the ongoing case are 'another step towards transparency over what took place.' When the trial takes place next year in February 2027, members of the Stoli Group 'will have to explain exactly how the deal was orchestrated,' with Shefler possibly taking to the stand as well. Jolie had sold her stake of the winery to the group's wine division called Tenute del Mondo.The Daily Mail also revealed that the California Court of Appeal reversed a lower court decision that had allowed Shefler to walk away from the lawsuit by claiming he had little involvement in the $64 million deal that made him Pitt's unwilling business partner.'Angelina knew Brad didn't want to sell her share of Miraval to Shefler, and she had agreed with Brad that he would have first right of refusal. So selling to Shefler behind Brad's back was spiteful,' an insider told the Daily Mail. 'This was payback after the custody dispute. And now Shefler will have to divulge what really happened behind the scenes and how the deal was orchestrated.' The case, which notably involves a combined estate valuation of approximately $164 million, is scheduled for trial on February 1, 2027, with mediation ordered for October 28. Pitt and Jolie were previously married from 2014 until their split two years later. The divorce became legal in 2019. And in late 2024, it was revealed that the former couple had reached a divorce settlement following a lengthy, eight-year battle. The two stars share three biological children Shiloh, 20, as well as twins Knox and Vivienne, 18. The pair also share Maddox, 24, Pax, 22 and Zahara, 21.
 |
source : Daily mail
Share
