Welcome
- Details
- Published on Thursday, 01 November 2012 10:58
- Written by Super User
I know what you are thinking: "Here we go... Another site about Angelina Jolie....". But usually, the most sites you can find about her are about others as well...Here, no other. No one else than the wonderful Angelina Jolie.
I am regularly doing my best to give you the most about Angie. Detailed filmography with video clips and HQ captures, over 74.000 HQ pictures, 17.000 scans of magazines, loads of audio and videoclips, articles, the best links, and goodies such as wallpapers, icons, puzzles, screensavers, skins....
I, the webmaster, and my team, are 100% devoted to Angelina Jolie, as to you. Looking for anything about Angelina? You know what site you have to visit ;)
For a full-access to the Absolument Jolie webste and the news, please connect or register !
Last update : 29/07/2026 
Brad Pitt asks court to ORDER Angelina Jolie to turn over financial records after she claimed she put 'career on hold'
- Details
- Published on Wednesday, 05 August 2026 04:31
- Written by Daily mail
The legal showdown between Brad Pitt and his ex Angelina Jolie has taken another dramatic turn.Pitt, 62, is now asking the court to order Jolie to produce records showing her income from 2017 to 2019, after she claimed to have 'largely put her career on hold' and forewent 'years of compensation' following their 2016 separation.Jolie, 51, allegedly agreed to produce financial records from the years 2017 to 2021, but has apparently only produced documents for the years 2020 and 2021. The Daily Mail has contacted representatives for both Pitt and Jolie for comment. In court documents obtained by The Daily Mail, Pitt's lawyers allege Jolie has been withholding specific financial documents despite agreeing to produce said records.'Jolie’s Cross-Complaint alleges that, after the parties’ 2016 separation, she put her career on hold, “forgoing years of compensation”; that Pitt possessed “substantial leverage and control” over her due in part to her financial condition at that time; and that by 2019 she concluded she needed to sell her interest in Miraval to obtain “financial independence” from him,' Pitt's filing reads. 'On February 23, 2026, Jolie withdrew both her agreement to provide declarations responsive to Request Nos. 81 and 82 for the full 2017-2021 period and her agreement to produce participation statements from that same period.'They allege she instead provided 'supplemental responses limiting her production to 2020 and 2021, and later produced profit participation statements and tax returns for those two years only as well.'They are now seeking to produce documents showing her annual income and profit participation statements from 2017 to 2019. 'Prior to the IDC [Informal Discovery Conference], Plaintiffs proposed that Jolie stipulate that she was not under economic pressure before January 1, 2020, and that Pitt did not exert economic coercion on her from 2017 to 2019. Jolie declined.'At the IDC, the Court then separately proposed limiting the scope of Jolie’s testimony concerning her earnings and compensation. Again, Jolie declined the proposal. Instead, Jolie confirmed at the IDC that she may argue at trial that Pitt used Miraval as leverage to control her and that her decision to put her career on hold bears on why the proposed NDA was allegedly abusive. The parties therefore did not resolve the dispute.''The Requests seek information directly bearing on financial assertions Jolie pleaded: that she forwent “years of compensation,” that Miraval was her “most important asset,” and that Pitt’s control over Miraval distributions gave him “substantial leverage and control” over her during the period leading to her 2019 decision to sell her stake in Chateau Miraval.''Request No. 81 seeks documents sufficient to show Jolie’s earned income during the period between her separation from Pitt through 2019— the year Jolie allegedly decided she needed to sell Miraval—while Request No. 82 seeks documents sufficient to show Jolie’s earnings from the profit-sharing bonuses she received during that period from her earlier acting and directing roles.' 'Jolie may be able to establish from public information that she held fewer acting or directing roles from 2017–2019 than she did in prior years. But paragraph 23 of her Cross Complaint goes further: it alleges that she forwent “years of compensation.” Documents showing the earned income and profit participation payments she received during those years will permit Plaintiffs to test the accuracy and context of that allegation.' Yet, in a previous legal filing, Jolie hit back at Pitt's characterization of her remarks for 'financial independence', claiming she was misquoted.
She also noted she has already provided financial records despite having 'no obligation to do so.' 'Pitt claims that Jolie has put her entire financial condition at issue going back to 2017 because of her allegation that she was seeking “financial independence.” (IDC Statement at 3:2-6.),' a documented filed in June stated. 'But Pitt’s selective quote misleadingly fails to include the entirety of her allegation. Jolie does not allege that she was seeking financial independence in the abstract; she alleges that she was seeking “financial independence from her ex-husband [Pitt].”''Separating from one’s ex-husband is categorically different from an allegation that one is suffering general financial distress. Jolie has never alleged that she was in financial distress—her allegations are clear that she sought to untangle her financial life from the ex-spouse she was divorcing. That distinction is dispositive.'It further notes: 'Pitt also inaccurately ties his demand for a coercive NDA to Jolie’s financial condition, but here too his summaries are not accurate. Appearing to mock her, Pitt highlights that the NDA he proposed “nearly broke her,” and concludes from this, in conjunction with Jolie’s conclusion that she had to sell Miraval to someone else, that Jolie placed Her entire financial condition at issue because she felt “financially cornered.” But the phrase “financially cornered” is Pitt’s phrase, not Jolie’s. Jolie never once made that allegation. 'And the distinction above applies here too: her ex-husband was attempting to have her sign an NDA to cover up his abuse of her and their children as a condition to him buying her most valuable asset, which was their biggest financial entanglement. The issue is not whether Jolie needed the money—the issue is that she was trying to untangle her life and her finances from her controlling and abusive ex husband. That distinction makes all the difference.' They also allege digging into Jolie's finances from 2017-2019 pose a 'serious invasion' of her 'privacy rights.' 'In short, the entire basis for Pitt compelling these answers is a made-up theory that Jolie did not allege. Nevertheless, to narrow the dispute, and although she feels very strongly that she did not have to do this, Jolie already agreed to produce and has in fact produced her tax returns, and all of her profit participation statements showing any income received, for 2020 and 2021 Although Jolie had no obligation to do so, producing these documents should have ended this dispute. These two years of private financial information—leading up to (2020) and during (2021) – the very dispute that is at the center of this case—already provided Pitt all the insight he needs into Jolie’s financial condition. Going back any further is a serious invasion of Jolie’s privacy rights'.
For a decade, Pitt and Jolie were seen as Hollywood's 'It' couple during their long-term relationship after they met on the set of the 2005 film Mr and Mrs Smith.They married in August 2014 during a secret ceremony in the South of France and welcomed three children together during their romance: Shiloh in 2006 and twins Vivienne and Knox in 2008.They also adopted two more, Zahara and Pax, and Pitt legally adopted the son that Angelina had adopted before they got together, Maddox. But in 2016, it came to an explosive end after the pair got into an alleged physical altercation while on a private flight with their six children and Jolie later filed for divorce. Jolie later claimed that Pitt 'choked' one of the children during the horrifying dispute and 'struck' another in the face, leaving her and the youngsters feeling like 'hostages' and cowering in fear under a blanket for hours until they landed.She also alleged that he grabbed her by the head, slammed her against a wall, and violently shook her at one point during the flight - which resulted in her injuring her back and elbow. Pitt's representative called Jolie's account 'completely untrue' to CNN at first, but then released an amended statement to the publication that read, 'Angelina's story continues to evolve each time she tells it.'Brad has accepted responsibility for what he did but will not for things he didn’t do. He has been on the receiving end of every type of personal attack and misrepresentation.'Thankfully, the various public authorities she has tried to use against him over the past six years have made their own independent decisions. Brad will continue to respond in court as he has consistently done.'Since they split, the two stars have been embroiled in one of the most publicized legal battles in Hollywood history over custody of their children, as well as the winery that they once owned together.In May 2021, after years of duking it out in court, Pitt and Jolie were officially granted joint custody of their six children, but one month later, the judge's decision was thrown out.The fallout from their split has gotten progressively uglier. Zahara, Vivienne, Maddox, Shiloh and Vivienne have all stopped using their father's last name. It's unclear where Pax stands. Pitt has since moved on romantically and has been dating jewelry designer Ines de Ramon for the last few years.
 |
source : Daily mail 
Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie's French winery threatened by raging wildfires amid legal battle over estate
- Details
- Published on Monday, 03 August 2026 06:21
- Written by Super User
Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie's French winery Chateau Miraval has been threatened by raging wildfires amid their ongoing legal war over the estate. The 62-year-old actor, whose youngest daughter Vivienne recently filed to drop his last name along with other siblings, initially purchased the winery back in 2012 with the Maleficent actress, 51. Earlier this week, it was revealed that George Clooney and wife Amal as well as nine-year-old twins, Alexander and Ella, were forced to evacuate their French home in the Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur region. Wildfires have been spreading across Europe in other countries including Italy and Spain. Chateau Miraval is located in the village of Correns in the southeastern area of France, where the Correns Fire is currently burning. In a photo obtained by TMZ, brown smoke could be seen filling the sky close to the winery and its sprawling vineyards. Firefighters have been using water from a private lake on the expansive property to help extinguish the flames, according to the outlet. Another image captured towers of gray smoke near a vineyard in Correns on Friday. After the sun had set, the glow of red and orange flames near Correns filled the night sky as firefighters continued to battle the inferno. Daily Mail has reached out to reps for Jolie for comment. A rep for Pitt denied to comment. The former couple are not the first Hollywood celebrities to be affected by the wildfires in Europe. Clooney revealed that his family were forced to flee their French residence due to the flames in a letter to the mayor of Brignoles, Didier Brémond, which his representative confirmed to People on Wednesday. In the short but stirring letter, the actor reportedly vowed to support the French town, which is home to just under 18,000 people, regardless of the impact of the encroaching fires. 'Dear Didier, At this point we have no idea whether our beautiful home makes it through this terrible moment,' Clooney began.'As we evacuate Brignoles we want to emphasise 2 things, first we hope you and the people of our city are safe and second that Amal and I are committed to making sure that whatever happens to our village, we are part of this community and we’ll be part of making it whole,' he wrote. 'We love Brignoles and our friends who live there.' The Clooneys announced their evacuation on the same day that the EU's emergency response chief warned that wildfires could potentially engulf 'all of Europe' within days. Greece, Italy and Central Europe are now expected to face the highest wildfire risk in the coming weeks, raising fears of fresh disasters even as firefighters continue battling major blazes across southern Europe.
Pitt and Jolie have been embroiled in an ongoing legal battle over their French winery, with a trial set to take place next year in February 2027. The F1 actor first sued Jolie in February 2022, alleging she had secretly sold her half of their beloved Provençal estate, where the former couple married in 2014, without his consent.The star claimed that he and Jolie had an implied agreement that neither would sell their share to a third party without the other's approval, a deal Jolie's side has denied ever existed.In legal documents obtained by the Daily Mail, Pitt requested Jolie turn in her tax records and other financial documents pertaining to the years 2017–2019, based on remarks she made that she says Pitt is taking out of context.The Maleficent actress said in legal documents reviewed by TMZ that his efforts are part of a 'continued mischaracterization and selective quoting' of statements she's made about the long-running case.Pitt told the court that he has expended time and labor into the winery in Correns, France, and he claimed Jolie breached their pact when she sold her share of the estate to Russian billionaire Yuri Shefler.Jolie told the court that she didn't need Pitt's approval over the transaction; and that he took past statements that she made about the sale to achieve 'financial independence' out of context.The Daily Mail also previously reached out to representatives for Jolie and Pitt for further comment on the story.Jolie clarified her comment to mean that she wanted to delineate her finances from Pitt's in an effort to separate herself from him, and not about her money situation in general. Pitt's attorneys told the court that the remark essentially opened her up to scrutiny considering the nature of the litigation. Jolie's legal team said the gist of her remark was that she had been looking for 'financial independence from her ex-husband.' It was added that 'separating from one's ex-husband is categorically different from allegations that one is suffering from general financial distress.' Her team emphasized that she had been looking to 'untangle her life and her finances from' Pitt.And in June, it was reported that Jolie is 'looking forward' to the upcoming trial.
It came after the Daily Mail revealed that Pitt scored a major legal win as he is set to go face-to-face with Shefler who bought Jolie's stake in the vineyard.A California Superior Court has also granted the F1 star's motion to depose members of the Stoli Group, which is run by Shefler, per a June 17 court filing obtained by People.One year earlier, Pitt sought to depose the company's executive Alexey Oliynik. But lawyers for Jolie argued Oliynik did not have to present documents or appear for a deposition due to being a Swiss resident.But now according to the filing, depositions for Oliynik as well as other 'persons most qualified' need to occur by September 30 of this year in London.One of Jolie's lawyers also told People that Pitt's latest legal wins 'have made no impact on the merits of the case, and certainly has no impact on Ms. Jolie's case.' The actress is instead 'looking forward to defeating the case at trial next year so that their family can finally focus their energies on healing and moving on.' A separate source claimed to People that Pitt 'refused to work' with the Stoli Group due to Jolie being the one who had chosen the company.But an insider close to the Hollywood actor stated that his legal victories in the ongoing case are 'another step towards transparency over what took place.' When the trial takes place next year in February 2027, members of the Stoli Group 'will have to explain exactly how the deal was orchestrated,' with Shefler possibly taking to the stand as well. Jolie had sold her stake of the winery to the group's wine division called Tenute del Mondo.The Daily Mail also revealed that the California Court of Appeal reversed a lower court decision that had allowed Shefler to walk away from the lawsuit by claiming he had little involvement in the $64 million deal that made him Pitt's unwilling business partner.'Angelina knew Brad didn't want to sell her share of Miraval to Shefler, and she had agreed with Brad that he would have first right of refusal. So selling to Shefler behind Brad's back was spiteful,' an insider told the Daily Mail. 'This was payback after the custody dispute. And now Shefler will have to divulge what really happened behind the scenes and how the deal was orchestrated.' The case, which notably involves a combined estate valuation of approximately $164 million, is scheduled for trial on February 1, 2027, with mediation ordered for October 28. Pitt and Jolie were previously married from 2014 until their split two years later. The divorce became legal in 2019. And in late 2024, it was revealed that the former couple had reached a divorce settlement following a lengthy, eight-year battle. The two stars share three biological children Shiloh, 20, as well as twins Knox and Vivienne, 18. The pair also share Maddox, 24, Pax, 22 and Zahara, 21.
 |
source : Daily mail
Angelina Jolie among Hollywood stars hit by 'huge data breach after contact details exposed', cybersecurity expert claims
- Details
- Published on Sunday, 26 July 2026 15:11
- Written by Daily mail
Angelina Jolie is among Hollywood stars hit by 'huge data breach after contact details exposed', a cybersecurity expert has claimed. Jeremiah Fowler says information such as phone numbers and private email addresses were made publicly accessible online, putting the celebs at great risk.The stars' personal details were found among 666,369 records relating to New York's annual Tribeca Film Festival, which was launched in 2002 by Hollywood star Robert De Niro.Mr Fowler has now branded the leak the 'biggest he's ever seen' and claims he viewed details for Jolie and De Niro.Other stars named include British filmmaker Danny Boyle as well as Neil Patrick Harris, Michael Douglas, Rami Malek, Sharon Stone, plus directors George Lucas and Martin Scorsese, Mr Fowler said.Fowler discovered three exposed databases relating to Tribeca and believes the leak was down to human error.Most of the records, between 2019 and 2026, were marketing materials, such as press releases, stored on a cloud system.However, one of the databases had a back-up file which included a folder called 'contacts' with personal information.Mr Fowler said he got into touch with festival chiefs after discovering the breach days before the film festival got underway last month, and the database was removed from public access. Earlier this year, Fowler discovered a data exposure of what appears to be stalkerware leveraged to track a celebrity victim. The leaked database contained 86,859 images that seemed to be screenshots from a user's device, related to one specific celebrity.Fowler discovered the database in question was publicly accessible and without password protection, and it appeared to belong to an individual targeting one specific celebrity, a notable European entrepreneur/media personality. The screenshots capture communications with business associates, models, influencers, and celebrities; furthermore, intimate conversations and photos intended to be private were likewise captured.The researcher for US-based firm Black Hills Information Security told The Sun on Sunday that his latest investigation resulted in 'by far the biggest collection of celebrity data I've ever seen'.He added: 'There were many, many household names in the records who could have been targeted with malware. There were names, phone numbers and email addresses.'Tribeca Film Festival has been contacted for a statement.
 |
source : Daily mail
Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie's youngest daughter Vivienne, 18, files to DROP actor's last name as she joins older siblings in snubbing the Oscar winner
- Details
- Published on Wednesday, 22 July 2026 04:10
- Written by Daily mail
Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie's youngest daughter Vivienne has filed to legally drop the actor's last name. The 18-year-old has followed in the footsteps of her three older siblings and filed a petition in Los Angeles County Superior Court requesting that her legal name be changed from Vivienne Marcheline Jolie-Pitt to Vivienne Marcheline Jolie.The reason behind the teenager's name change is listed as 'personal,' according to court documents obtained by the Daily Mail. An official court hearing is scheduled for November 2.The petition is only the latest move in Vivienne's ongoing effort to distance herself from the Pitt name.Back in May 2024, she notably dropped her father's surname in the Playbill program for the Broadway production of The Outsiders, listing her name as Vivienne Jolie while serving as a producer alongside her mother.Born in 2008 alongside twin brother Knox, Vivienne is the youngest of the former couple's six children. The Daily Mail has reached out to representatives for Pitt and Jolie for comment.A source recently told the Daily Mail that Pitt views the rift with his children as 'deeply painful' and 'believes Angelina's role in how things unfolded is the ultimate betrayal.' It comes days after the actor's daughter Zahara, 21, and son Maddox, 24, published notices revealing their intentions to drop Pitt from their last names.The advertisements were both published in the Los Angeles Daily Journal throughout June and July.'Petitioner Zahara Marley Jolie-Pitt filed a petition with this court for a decree changing names as follows: Zahara Marley Jolie-Pitt to Zahara Marley Jolie,' one notice stated.'Petitioner Maddox Chivan Jolie-Pitt filed a petition with this court for a decree changing names as follows: Maddox Chivan Jolie-Pitt to Maddox Chivan Jolie,' the other said.The notices both invite dissenting parties to appear at a scheduled hearing over the matter; Zahara's is scheduled for September 28 while Maddox's is on September 14.In the state of California, those seeking to legally change their name must publish an Order to Show Cause, a document requesting the name change, for four weeks in a row in a newspaper before their court date.Zahara's notice appeared a month after she filed a petition requesting that her new name be Zahara Marley Jolie.Maddox also filed to drop the actor's last name in late May.Zahara publicly dropped the last name three years ago when she joined a sorority at Spelman College.She also went by Zahara Marley Jolie during her graduation ceremony, which her father reportedly skipped, according to TMZ.'Nothing prevented him from showing up for her. Or ever visiting her. The day was about all she accomplished. Not whether he was willing to attend,' a source close to Jolie told the publication.
However, multiple sources have exclusively spoken to the Daily Mail in defense of Pitt, insisting that he is not the absent father he has been portrayed as and that he wants a relationship with his six children.Jolie and Pitt's other daughter Shiloh, 20, has also dropped the actor's last name. Last year, Shiloh, who was born Shiloh Nouvel Jolie-Pitt, legally changed her name to Shiloh Jolie.At the time, in a statement shared with People, Shiloh's lawyer Peter Levine said she 'made an independent and significant decision following painful events,' adding that she was 'merely following legal process' when publishing notice of the change. Pitt's relationship with son Pax, 22, who previously called his father a 'world-class a**hole' and accused him of making his younger siblings 'tremble in fear', doesn't seem to be any better, though it is not known if he has stopped using the name as well. A source previously told the Daily Mail how Pitt felt after Pax was pictured stumbling out of the Chateau Marmont last year propped up by several friends.'He has zero concern with what Pax does or doesn't do. [Pax's] actions reflect who he is,' the insider said. 'Brad honestly considers his relationship with Pax unfixable,' they added.The source went on to say that the actor doesn't appear to be planning any outreach to either of his adopted sons: 'Pax and Maddox have made it abundantly clear how they feel and Brad has nothing to say about either of them.' As for his other children, the source said that Pitt 'holds out hope that the others will one day come around. Time heals wounds.'A source close to Jolie also hit back at her ex-husband at the time and said: 'Brad continues to play the victim. His fractured relationship with his children is a direct result of how he has treated them.'After meeting on the set of the 2005 film Mr and Mrs Smith, Pitt and Jolie were seen as Hollywood's 'It' couple during their long-term relationship.They married in August 2014 during a secret ceremony in the South of France and welcomed three children together during their romance: Shiloh in 2006 and twins Vivienne and Knox in 2008.
They also adopted two more, Zahara and Pax, and Pitt legally adopted the son that Angelina had adopted before they got together, Maddox.Pitt and Jolie's marriage ended after a volatile plane incident in 2016 and abuse allegations, which Pitt has adamantly denied. He has also never been charged with a crime and the Los Angeles Department of Children and Family Services cleared Pitt of physical abuse allegations.The A-listers went on to battle it out in a grueling eight-year divorce battle that was finalized in 2024. The family divide was again brought to the forefront when Pitt's mother, Jane Etta Pitt, died last year at the age of 84.Sources revealed at the time that she had been cut off from her grandchildren for about nine years and they did not get a chance to speak before her death.'The most gut-wrenching part is that Angelina kept the kids away from his parents, from their own grandparents,' one insider alleged to the Daily Mail last August. Following his bitter divorce Pitt has moved on with jewelry designer Ines de Ramon, 33, whom he's been dating for the last few years.
 |
source : Daily mail
Share
